Friday, January 4, 2008
Toddler TV Trauma
“No, I'm Clifford!”
“Right, sorry. Clifford, would you please hold still for your diaper change?”
This scenario results from reading Clifford the Big Red Dog books, and then watching Clifford shows on Youtube.
Our daughter pretends to be every fictional character she encounters, and my wife and I must play along – all day, every day -- or face dire consequences.
It's wearing a little thin.
Thankfully, she's not yet making me wear a short skirt and knee-high striped socks like Emily Elizabeth.
But even if she did, it would still be a huge improvement over her “Little Einsteins” phase.
The child characters in “Little Einsteins” obsess over classical music and famous paintings so that yuppie parents will think the show is somehow making their children smarter.
In truth, the show is causing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, because the characters constantly holler about some impending crisis, such as the fact that the Mona Lisa is floating toward a giant waterfall, with dramatic, doom-connoting classical music playing in the background.
Not surprisingly, this hyped-up behavior rubbed off on our daughter, who spent a couple of weeks saying everything at maximum volume.
“NO, I'M JUNE!!!!”
Of all the Little Einsteins, June is my least favorite, because she wears make-up and earrings, and her eyes are shaped a little seductively, like she's about to wink. It gives me the heebie-jeebies.
Often our daughter combines themes, taking on Little Einsteins personalities while engaged in a crucial animal rescue mission inspired by the children's TV series “Go Diego, Go!”
Diego is the masculine spin-off of Dora the Explorer. They are actually the same character, with the same voices, speech patterns, thirst for exotic adventure, enormous mechanical eyeballs, and annoying habit of asking you questions and then staring cryptically at you for ten full seconds, waiting for your answer, whether you've already finished giving it or not.
At the end of every show, Dora asks, “What was your favorite part?”
My daughter's answer: “My favorite part was giving water to the thirsty flower.”
My answer: “I liked not pretending to be a vaguely sexualized two-dimensional six-year-old for 20 minutes so I could sit and read the sports page.”
Diego does not have time for such pleasantries. He is busy rescuing exotic animals from waterfalls (of course).
As a direct result, our couch is now a waterfall, and anyone who sits on it is in dire peril and must be rescued immediately.
(Not much of a change, come to think of it).
It all makes me long for the days of Barney, when our anthem was “I love you, you love me” and the biggest thing we had to worry about was how long it would take that tall kid to realize puberty had set in and it was time for him to scramble out of there.
I also reminisce about The Wiggles, when the world was full of frenetic, coked-up Australian guys dancing around like... like... frenetic, coked-up Australians, singing about mashed potatoes and pirates and everything else that is pure and decent in this world.
But at least we still have Clifford, that wholesome, good-natured, and laid-back dog who--
Hold on, I'll finish as soon as I get this skirt on.
Friday, May 18, 2007
Your Referendumb Guide
Wouldn’t that be fun? Alas, the more likely scenario is that the voters will scratch their heads, close their eyes, and make random marks on the ballot. This is how democracy has worked for centuries. Last year I made a smiley face.
What a shame. If only voters had a clear understanding of what the referendum questions mean.
That’s why I’m here.
First, the basics. On June 12 we'll be voting on bond issues. A “bond issue” is where the government borrows money from a bank and promises to pay it back with interest.
I have a bias against bonds because if the state would instead put its giant infrastructure projects on its Discover Card™, we would be eligible for Cash Back bonuses and frequent-flyer rewards miles.
Now, about this year’s bond issues:
Question 1 asks if we want to borrow $100 million for road and bridge improvements. You should vote “no” on this question, because all the money will be spent on roads and bridges you do not drive on.
Instead, the money will probably go to improve relatively pristine roads in Southern Maine, or on stretches of Interstate with insignificant little cracks that give wealthy tourists in RVs the heebie-jeebies.
Question 1 also asks for $3.6 million for transit and bus facilities (another Southern Maine thing) and $3.2 million for airport improvements (we can thank the mighty Single-Engine Cessna lobby for that one). Why does every rinky-dink town need an airport? In Central Maine, there are four within an hour’s drive of each other: Waterville, Augusta, Pittsfield, and Dexter. If this makes sense to you, then you are a pilot living in Central Maine. Otherwise, vote against Question 1.
The $1.7 million for harbors and $500,000 for bicycle and walking trails are the only worthwhile components of this bond issue, but of course they are lumped together with the other garbage.
“Excuse me, waiter? Can I get a glass of juice, please?”
“Sure, but you’ll also have to buy the filet mignon, the lobster bisque, and the roast duck on a brick with side cheese torte.”
“Oh, well, then, forget it. I’ll just have water.”
In which case, you’ll want to vote “yes” on Question 2, which asks us for $18.3 million to improve public drinking water systems and wastewater treatment plants.
Anything to do with making sure sewage goes where it’s supposed to and doesn’t end up negatively impacting water I might need someday gets automatic approval from me.
Vote “yes” on Question 2, unless you like sharing your bath with pieces of turd.
There you have it – a simple guide to voting on June 12. All you have to remember is “yes, no.” Or was it “no, yes?”
If in doubt, just make a smiley face on the ballot and your life will continue as before.

